Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Sciences

Volume: 45 Issue: 1

  • subscription
  • Review Article

Exploring methodologies in Cannabis tissue-culture and genetic transformation: Opportunities and obstacles

SHUKLA D*

*Tissue-culture and Transformation Facility, Plant Biotechnology Division, CSIR – Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Picnic Spot road Kukrail, Lucknow – 226015, Uttar Pradesh, India

Email: [email protected]

Year: 2023, Page: 1-16, Doi: https://doi.org/10.62029/jmaps.v45i1.shukla

Received: May 12, 2023 Accepted: June 17, 2023 Published: Oct. 27, 2023

Abstract

In recent years, the growing interest in Cannabis sativa L., particularly its medicinal and aromatic properties, has propelled advancements in its tissue culture and genetic transformation techniques. This review delineates the significant strides and persistent challenges in the field, offering a comprehensive overview of the current methodologies and their implications. It discusses the synergistic effects of Thidiazuron (TDZ) and Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) in the Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium as well as the use of meta-topolin (mT). This synthetic cytokinin (mT) facilitates a high induction frequency and many shoots per explant. It introduces a time-efficient and resource-optimized pathway for Cannabis micropropagation and germplasm conservation. The genetic transformation in Cannabis was predominantly facilitated through Agrobacterium mediated transformation, a cornerstone technique that enabled the integration of foreign genes into the plant genome. Regulatory implications associated with gene editing in Cannabis sativa are highlighted. Despite these advancements, the field grapples with several challenges, including the recalcitrant nature of Cannabis, especially regarding in vitro propagation or genetic transformation, the genotypic specificity of regeneration protocols, and the reproducibility of existing methods. The complexity of the Cannabis genome, characterized by a high degree of polymorphism and multiple copies of specific genes, further exacerbates these challenges. Moreover, the current research landscape is marred by a lack of standardized protocols and variable responses among different Cannabis varieties, necessitating more robust and universally applicable protocols. This review underscores the pressing need for further research to optimize protocols for higher efficiency and to develop suitable systems for in-vitro plantlet regeneration.

Keywords: Cannabis sativa, Genetic transformation, Hemp, Regeneration, Tissue culture

References

Abel EL. 1980. Marihuana: The First Twelve Thousand Years. New York (USA): Plenum Press.

Adhikary D, Kulkarni M, El-Mezawy A, Mobini S, Elhiti M, Gjuric R, Ray A, Polowick P, Slaski JJ, Jones MP, Bhowmik P. 2021. Medical Cannabis and Industrial Hemp Tissue Culture: Present Status and Future Potential. Front Plant Sci 12: 627240.

Adinoff B, Reiman A. 2019. Implementing Social Justice in the Transition from Illicit to Legal Cannabis. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 45: 673-688.

Chand S, Singh AK. 2004. Plant Regeneration from Encapsulated Nodal Segments of Dalbergia sissoo Roxb., a Timber-Yielding Leguminous Tree Species. J Plant Physiol 161: 237-243.

Chandra S, Lata H, Khan IA, ElSohly MA. 2011. Photosynthetic Response of Cannabis sativa L. to Elevated Levels of CO2. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 17: 291-295.

Chaohua C, Gonggu Z, Lining Z, Chunsheng G, Qing T, Jianhua C, Xinbo G, Dingxiang P, Jianguang S. 2016. A Rapid Shoot Regeneration Protocol from the Cotyledons of Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Ind Crops Prod 83: 61-65.

Chopra IC, Chopra RN. 1957. The use of cannabis drugs in India. Bulle Narc 9: 4-29.

Clarke RC, Merlin MD. 2016. Cannabis Domestication, Breeding History, Present-day Genetic Diversity, and Future Prospects. Crit Rev Plant Sci 35: 293-327.

Deguchi M, Bogush D, Weeden H, Spuhler Z, Potlakayala S, Kondo T, Zhang ZJ, Rudrabhatla S. 2020. Establishment and optimization of a Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Agroinfiltration System for Gene Expression and Silencing Studies. Sci Rep 10: 3504.

ElSohly MA, Radwan MM, Gul W, Chandra S, Galal A. 2017. Phytochemistry of Cannabis sativa L. In: Kinghorn AD, Falk H, Gibbons S, Kobayashi J, (Eds.) Phytocannabinoids, Springer International Publishing, pp 1–36.

Feeney M, Punja ZK. 2003. Tissue Culture and Agrobacterium-mediated Transformation of Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 39: 578-585.

Galán-Ávila A, García-Fortea E, Prohens J, Herraiz FJ. 2020. Development of a Direct in-vitro Plant Regeneration Protocol From Cannabis sativa L. Seedling Explants: Developmental Morphology of Shoot Regeneration and Ploidy Level of Regenerated Plants. Front Plant Sci 11: 645.

Galán-Ávila A, Gramazio P, Ron M, Prohens J, Herraiz FJ. 2021. A Novel and Rapid Method for Agrobacterium-mediated Production of Stably Transformed Cannabis sativa L. Plants. Ind Crops Prod 170: 113691.

Hesami M, Baiton A, Alizadeh M, Pepe M, Torkamaneh D, Jones AMP. 2021. Advances and Perspectives in Tissue Culture and Genetic Engineering of Cannabis. Int J Mol Sci 22: 5671.

Ioannidis K, Tomprou I, Mitsis V. 2022. An Alternative In-vitro Propagation Protocol of Cannabis sativa L. (Cannabaceae) Presenting Efficient Rooting, for Commercial Production. Plants 11: 1333.

Iversen LL. 2008. The Science of Marijuana. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.

Kuddus M, Ginawi I, AlHazimi A. 2013. Cannabis sativa: An Ancient Wild Edible Plant of India. Emirates J Food Agric 25: 736.

Lata H, Chandra S, Khan IA, ElSohly M. 2010. High Frequency Plant Regeneration from Leaf Derived Callus of High Δ9- Tetrahydrocannabinol Yielding Cannabis sativa L. Planta Medica 76:1629–1633.

Lata H, Chandra S, Khan IA, ElSohly MA. 2009a. Propagation Through Alginate Encapsulation of Axillary Buds of Cannabis sativa L. —An Important Medicinal Plant. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 15: 79-86.

Lata H, Chandra S, Khan IA, ElSohly MA. 2009b. Thidiazuron-induced High-frequency Direct Shoot Organogenesis of Cannabis sativa L. In-Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 45: 12-19.

Lata H, Chandra S, Khan IA, ElSohly MA. 2016. In-vitro Propagation of Cannabis sativa L. and Evaluation of Regenerated Plants for Genetic Fidelity and Cannabinoids Content for Quality Assurance. In: Jain SM, (Ed.) Protocols for In Vitro Cultures and Secondary Metabolite Analysis of Aromatic and Medicinal Plants. Springer New York, pp. 275–288.

Lubell-Brand JD, Kurtz LE, Brand MH. 2021. An in vitro–Ex-Vitro Micropropagation System for Hemp. Hort Technol 31: 199-207.

Monthony AS, Kyne ST, Grainger CM, Jones AMP. 2021. Recalcitrance of Cannabis sativa to De Novo Regeneration; A Multi-genotype Replication Study. PLOS ONE 16: e0235525.

Monthony AS, Page SR, Hesami M, Jones AMP. 2021. The Past, Present and Future of Cannabis sativa Tissue Culture. Plants 10: 185.

Movahedi M, Ghasemi-Omran V, Torabi S. 2015. The Effect of Different Concentrations of TDZ and BA on In-vitro Regeneration of Iranian Cannabis (Cannabis sativa) Using Cotyledon and Epicotyl Explants. J Plant Mol Breeding 3.

Musio S, Müssig J, Amaducci S. 2018. Optimizing Hemp Fiber Production for High Performance Composite Applications. Front Plant Sci 9: 1702.

Page SRG, Monthony AS, Jones AMP. 2020. DKW basal salts improve micropropagation and callogenesis compared to MS basal salts in multiple commercial cultivars of Cannabis sativa. Plant Bio [Preprint].

Piunno KF, Golenia G, Boudko EA, Downey C, Jones AMP. 2019. Regeneration of shoots from immature and mature inflorescences of Cannabis sativa. Can J Plant Sci 99: 556-559.

Raharjo TJ, Eucharia O, Chang W-T, Verpoorte R. 2010. Callus induction and phytochemical characterization of Cannabis sativa cell suspension cultures. Indones J Chem 6: 70-74.

Rai MK, Jaiswal VS, Jaiswal U. 2008. Encapsulation of shoot tips of guava (Psidium guajava L.) for short-term storage and germplasm exchange. Scientia Horticult 118: 33-38.

Rihan H, Kareem F, El-Mahrouk M, Fuller M. 2017. Artificial Seeds (Principle, Aspects and Applications). Agronomy 7: 71.

Slusarkiewicz-Jarzina A, Ponitka A, Kaczmarek Z. 2005. Influence of cultivar, explant source and plant growth regulator on callus induction and plant regeneration of Cannabis sativa L. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 47: 145-151.

Smýkalová I, Vrbová M, Cvečková M, Plačková L, Žukauskaitė A, Zatloukal M, Hrdlička J, Plíhalová L, Doležal K, Griga M. 2019. The effects of novel synthetic cytokinin derivatives and endogenous cytokinins on the in-vitro growth responses of Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) explants. Plant Cell, Tiss Org Cul 139: 381-394.

Wawrosch C, Zotchev SB. 2021. Production of bioactive plant secondary metabolites through in-vitro technologies—Status and outlook. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 105: 6649-6668.

Zhang X, Xu G, Cheng C, Lei L, Sun J, Xu Y, Deng C, Dai Z, Yang Z, Chen X, Liu C, Tang Q, Su J. 2021. Establishment of an Agrobacterium mediated genetic transformation and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Plant Biotechnol J 19: 1979-1987.

 

Cite this article

Shukla D. 2023. Exploring methodologies in Cannabis tissue-culture and genetic transformation: Opportunities and obstacles. J Med Aromat Plant Sci 45: 1-16.

Views
696
Downloads
7
Citations