Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Sciences

Volume: 41 Issue: 1

  • subscription
  • Original Research Article

Valorization of processed residue of plant biomass as nanocellulosic material

DISHA MISHRA1, RAGHVENDRA PRATAP SINGH, PAORABI DAS, ASHA SINGH1, VARSHA PANDEY1, PV AJAYA KUMAR2, PUJA KHARE1 *

1Agronomy and Soil Science Division, CSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Lucknow-226015, India.
2Analytical Division, CSIR-Central Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Lucknow-226015, India.
*Corresponding author, E-mail: [email protected]

Year: 2019, Page: 39-49, Doi: https://doi.org/10.62029/jmaps.v41i1.Mishra

Received: Nov. 5, 2019 Accepted: Dec. 2, 2019 Published: Dec. 31, 2019

Abstract

Residual biomass of Cymbopogon winterianus (Citronella), Saccharum officinarum (Sugarcane bagasse) and Musa acuminata (Banana pseudo stem) were used as raw materials to produce nanofibrillar cellulose. Cellulose was extracted by bleaching treatments and, cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) were isolated by ultrasonication assisted TEMPO oxidation. Structure, morphology and thermal stability of the isolated CNFs were studied by Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), respectively. Swelling properties of the extracted CNFs were assessed at different pH. The aggregation and sedimentation behaviour of CNFs were evaluated at different salt concentration by measuring transmittance.The CNF isolated from bagasse was found to be more crystalline than those obtained from Citronella and banana stem biomass. Maximum swelling index was observed at neutral pH followed by alkaline pH. Swelling was prominent in Musa acuminate and Saccharum officinarum. Aggregation and sedimentation of CNFs occurred at high salt concentrartion while 10 mM was found to be the critical concentration of NaCl and CaCl2 for a stable dispersion of CNFs in water. This study provides a new approach for the effective utilization of agrowaste as a potential feedstock for the preparation of CNFs and their use in augmentation of advanced structural nanomaterials.
 

Keywords: CNF, Cymbopogon winterianus, Musa acuminate, Saccharum officinarum, TEMPO oxidation

References

Abraham E, Deepa B, Pothan L, Jacob M, Thomas S, Cvelbar U, Anandjiwala R. 2011. Extraction of nanocellulose fibrils from lignocellulosic fibres: a novel approach. Carbohydrate Polymers 86 : 1468-1475.

Abraham E, Deepa B, Pothen L, Cintil J, Thomas S, John M, Anandjiwala R, Narine S. 2013. Environmental friendly method for the extraction of coir fibre and isolation of nanofibre. Carbohydrate Polymers 92: 1477-1483.

Alonso Gutierrez MDLS. 2005. Valorisation of the bagasse of the tequilana agavae W. cv azul: caractérisation, study of the digestibility and fermentation of sugars. Ph.D Thesis, Agro-Industrial Chemistry Department, Toulouse, France.

Amin MCIM, Ahmad N, Halib N, Ahmad I. 2012. Synthesis and characterization of thermo-and pH-responsive bacterial cellulose/acrylic acid hydrogels for drug delivery. Carbohydrate Polymers 88: 465-473.

Chen P, Yu H, Liu Y, Chen W, Wang X, Ouyang M. 2013. Concentration effects on the isolation and dynamic rheological behavior of cellulose nanofibers via ultrasonic processing. Cellulose 20: 149-157.

Chen Y, Wu Q, Huang B, Huang M, Ai X. 2014. Isolation and Characteristics of Cellulose and Nanocellulose from Lotus Leaf Stalk Agrowastes. Bioresources 10 : 684-696.

Chirayil CJ, Joy J, Mathew L, Mozetic M, Koetz J, Thomas S. 2014. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from Helicteres isora plant. Industrial Crops and Products 59: 27-34.

Dos Santos RM, Neto WPF, Silvério HA, Martins DF, Dantas NO, Pasquini D. 2013. Cellulose nanocrystals from pineapple leaf. A new approach for the reuse of this agrowaste. Indus Crops Prod 50: 707-714.

Dufresne A. 2013. Nanocellulose: a new ageless bionanomaterial. Materials Today 16: 220-227.

Espino E, Cakir M, Domenek S, RománGutiérrez AD, Belgacem N, Bras J. 2014. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from industrial by-products of Agave tequilana and barley. Indus Crops Prod 62: 552-559.

Ferrer A, Quintana E, Filpponen I, Solala I, Vidal T, Rodríguez A, Laine J, Rojas OJ. 2012. Effect of residual lignin and heteropolysaccharides in nanofibrillar cellulose and nanopaper from wood fibers. Cellulose 19 : 2179-2193.

Fukuzumi H, Tanaka R, Saito T, Isogai A. 2014. Dispersion stability and aggregation behavior of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils in water as a function of salt addition. Cellulose 21: 1553-1559.

Habibi Y, Mahrouz M, Vignon MR. 2009. Microfibrillated cellulose from the peel of prickly pear fruits. Food Chem 115: 423-429.

Iwamoto S., Lee S-H, Endo T. 2013. Relationship between aspect ratio and suspension viscosity of wood cellulose nanofibers. Polymer J 46: 73-76.

Jiang F, Hsieh Y-L. 2013. Chemically and mechanically isolated nanocellulose and their self-assembled structures. Carbohydrate polymers 95: 32-40.

Johar N, Ahmad I, Dufresne A. 2012. Extraction, preparation and characterization of cellulose fibres and nanocrystals from rice husk. Indus Crops Prod 37: 93-99.

Johnson RK. 2010. TEMPO-oxidized nanocelluloses: Surface modification and use as additives in cellulosic nanocomposites in. Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University.

Jonoobi M, Harun J, Tahir PM, Shakeri A, SaifulAzry S, Makinejad MD. 2011. Physicochemical characterization of pulp and nanofibers from kenaf stem. Materials Lett 65: 1098-1100.

Kumar A, Negi YS, Choudhary V, Bhardwaj NK. 2014. Characterization of cellulose nanocrystals produced by acid-hydrolysis from sugarcane bagasse as agro-waste. J Materials Phy Chem 2: 1-8.

Mandal A, Chakrabarty D. 2011. Isolation of nanocellulose from waste sugarcane bagasse (SCB) and its characterization. Carbohydrate Polymers 86 : 1291-1299.

Missoum K, Belgacem MN, Bras J. 2013. Nanofibrillated cellulose surface modification: a review. Materials 6: 1745-1766.

Musha Y, Goring D. 1974. Klason and acidsoluble lignin content of hardwoods. Wood Sci For Prod Res Soc Madison.

Nishiyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H. 2002. Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose Iâ from synchrotron Xray and neutron fiber diffraction. Journal of the American Chemical Society 124: 9074- 9082.

Okita Y, Saito T, Isogai A. 2009. TEMPOmediated oxidation of softwood thermomechanical pulp. Holzforschung 63: 529-535.

Pasquini D, de Morais Teixeira E, da Silva Curvelo AA, Belgacem MN, Dufresne A. 2010. Extraction of cellulose whiskers from cassava bagasse and their applications as reinforcing agent in natural rubber. Indus Crops Prod 32 : 486-490.

Rehman N, de Miranda MIG, Rosa SM, Pimentel DM, Nachtigall SM, Bica CI. 2014. Cellulose and nanocellulose from maize straw: an insight on the crystal properties. J Polymers Environ 22: 252-259.

Sacui IA, Nieuwendaal RC, Burnett DJ, Stranick SJ, Jorfi M, Weder C, Foster EJ, Olsson RT, Gilman JW. 2014. Comparison of the properties of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils isolated from bacteria, tunicate, and wood processed using acid, enzymatic, mechanical, and oxidative methods. ACS Appl Mat Interfaces 6 : 6127- 6138.

Saito T, Isogai A. 2004. TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. The effect of oxidation conditions on chemical and crystal structures of the water-insoluble fractions. Biomacromol 5: 1983-1989.

Sheltami RM, Abdullah I, Ahmad I, Dufresne A, Kargarzadeh H. 2012. Extraction of cellulose nanocrystals from mengkuang leaves (Pandanus tectorius). Carbohydrate Polymers 88: 772-779.

Stenstad P, Andresen M, Tanem BS, Stenius P. 2008. Chemical surface modifications of microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 15: 35-45.

Su Y, Burger C, Ma H, Chu B, Hsiao BS. 2015. Exploring the Nature of Cellulose Microfibrils. Biomacromol 16 : 1201-1209.

Sun R, Sun, 2002. Fractional and structural characterization of hemicelluloses isolated by alkali and alkaline peroxide from barley straw. Carbohydrate polymers 49: 415-423.

Tang Y, Yang S, Zhang N, Zhang J. 2014. Preparation and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose via low-intensity ultrasonic-assisted sulfuric acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 21: 335-346.

Updegraff DM. 1969. Semimicro determination of cellulose inbiological materials. Analy Biochem 32: 420-424.

Van Soest PV, Robertson J, Lewis V. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74: 3583-3597.

Wang H, Li D, Zhang R. 2013. Preparation of ultralong cellulose nanofibers and optically transparent nanopapers derived from waste corrugated paper pulp. Bioresources 8: 1374-1384
 

Cite this article

Disha Mishra, Raghvendra Pratap Singh, Paorabi Das, Asha Singh, Varsha Pandey, PV Ajaya Kumar, Puja Khare. 2019. Valorization of processed residue of plant biomass as nanocellulosic material. J Med Aromat Plant Sci 41: 39-49.
 

Views
178
Downloads
1
Citations