Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plant Sciences

Volume: 37 Issue: 1

  • subscription
  • Review Article

Dry root yield, nutrient uptake and economics of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera L. Dunal) as influenced by planting layouts, spacings and nutrient management under drip irrigation

PP GIRASE1*, MB DHONDE2, BD BHAKARE2

* Corresponding author, E-mail : [email protected]
Department of Agronomy, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra 413 722
1. College of Agriculture, Dhule-424004, Dist. Dhule (M. S.)
2. MPKV, Rahuri-413722 (M.S.)

Year: 2015, Page: 22-29, Doi: https://doi.org/10.62029/jmaps.v37i1.Girase

Received: Jan. 23, 2015 Accepted: Oct. 26, 2015 Published: Dec. 31, 2015

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rabi season for two years to study the response of Ashwagandha [Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal] to planting layouts, spacings and nutrient management levels under drip irrigation at Rahuri (Maharashtra). There were twenty four treatment combinations consisting of three planting layouts (broad bed furrow, ridges and furrow, flat bed) along with two treatments of spacings (30 cm x 20 cm, 45 cm x 20 cm) were embedded in main plots. Four levels of nutrient management (75 : 37.5 : 37.5 kg N,P2O5, K2O + 5 t FYM/ha, 50 : 25 : 25 kg N, P2O5, K2O + 5 t FYM/ha,25 : 12.5 : 12.5 kg N, P2O5, K2O + 5 t FYM/ha and control) were taken in sub plots. Broad bed furrow planting layout recorded significantly higher values of yield attributes viz., number of roots, root length, root diameter, dry root weight, number of berries and seed yield per plant and consequently recorded higher dry root (790 kg/ha) and seed yield (11.46 q/ha), nutrient uptake and harvest index (18.86%) as compared to ridges furrow and flat bed. The closer spacing of 30 cm x 20 cm registered significantly high dry root yield, seed yield, nutrient uptake and harvest index than wider spacing of 45 cm x 20 cm. At 30 cm x 20 cm spacing, the increase in dry root yield and seed yield was 19.89 and 15.20% over 45 cm x 20 cm, respectively. Significant increase in dry root yield, seed yield and nutrient uptake was noticed with increase in fertilizer levels from control to 75 : 37.5 : 37.5 kg N, P2O5, K2O + 5 t FYM/ha. Application of 75 : 37.5 : 37.5 kg N, P2O5, K2O + 5 t FYM/ha recorded significantly higher yield attributes as well as dry root yield (837 kg/ha), seed yield (13.29 q/ha), N (130.34 kg/ha), P (30.07 kg/ha) and K (159.49 kg/ha) uptake and harvest index (21.33%) than rest of fertilizer levels. Economic evaluation indicated that broad bed furrow planting method produced higher gross returns (‘ 2,20,379/ ha), net returns (‘ 1,60,796/ha) and B:C ratio (3.67) followed by ridges furrow and flat bed. The spacing of 30 cm x 20 cm and fertilized with 75:37.5:37.5 kg N, P2O5, K2O + 5 t FYM/ha obtained maximum gross returns (‘ 2,56,946/ha), net returns (‘ 1,92,496/ha), and B:C ratio than others.

Keywords: Ashwagandha, Drip irrigation, Nutrient management, Nutrient uptake, Planting layouts, Spacing, Yield

References

Andrade C. 2009. Ashwagandha for anxiety disorder. World J Bio. Psychiatry 10: 1818-22.

Anonymous, 2010. Annual Progress Report of AICRP on Water Management, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, pp. 73-78.

Ardeshna RB, Arvadia MK, Patil RG, Savani NG. 2013. Effect of land configuration and soil conditioners on growth and yield of turmeric (Curcuma longa). Ind J Agron 58: 412-415.

Chandra Ram, Kumar Dinesh, Aishwath, OP.2007. Growth, yield and nutrients uptake as influenced by different planting methods in safed musli (Chlorophytum borivilianum). Ind J Agric Sci 77: 558-560.

Jackson ML. 1973. Soil Chemical Analysis, Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi. 

Kahar LS, Tomar SS, Pathan MA, Nigam KB.1991. Effect of sowing dates and variety on root yield of ashwagandha. Ind J Agric Sci 16: 495.

Karad SR, Khade PD, Kubde AU, Jadav SR.2009. Effect of plant density and fertilizer levels on seed yield and seed quality in Ashwagandha. Int J Pl Sci 4: 396-398.

Kubsad VS, Pallad YB, Mansur CP. 2009. Dry root yield and economics of ashwagandha (Withania somnifera Dunal) as influenced by spacing and fertilizer levels. J Med Arom Pl Sci 31: 199-202.

Lubbe A, Verpoorte R. 2011. Cultivation of medicinal and aromatic plants for specially industrial materials. Indus Crops Prod 34: 214-16.

Nagella P, Murthy HN. 2011. Establishment of cell suspension cultures of Withania somnifera for the productin of withanolide-A. Biores Tech 101: 6735-39.

Pandey Sunita T, Bist ID, Kumar Rajesh, Singh Sarnam. 2007. Effect of planting techniques on the growth dynamics and root yield pattern of safed musli in mollisol of Uttarakhand. Pantnagar J Res 5: 34-35.

Pandey Sunita T, Singh Pankaj, Pandey Pooja 2006. Site specific nutrient management for Withania somnifera at subtropical belt of Uttaranchal. Int J Agri Sci 2: 626-628.

Patel DH. 2001. Effect of methods of sowing, nitrogen levels and time of harvesting on yield and quality parameters of ashwagandha var.WS-100. Ph.D. Thesis, Gujarat Agricultural University, Anand.

Ramesh Babu TI. 1996. Nutritional studies in ashwagandha. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.

Saudan Singh, Khanuja SPS, Aparbal Singh, Man Singh, Singh UB. 2003. Potential and economics of ashwagandha (Withania somnifera (Linn.) Dunal) in overlapping cropping system under rainfed conditions of tropical North India. J Spices Arom Crops 12: 101-106.

Senthil K. 2010. Medicinal plant research in India with special reference to Indian ginseng-Ashwagandha. In “National Conference on Biotechnology.” North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon. 29-30 Dec. 2010. pp.27.

Shukla HY, Shukla PK. 2012. Effect of stand geometry and plant growth regulators on root yield and alkaloid content of Ashwagandha (Withinia somnifera Dunal). Int J Med Arom Pl 2: 390-395.
 

Cite this article

PP Girase, MB Dhonde, BD Bhakare. 2015. Dry root yield, nutrient uptake and economics of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera L. Dunal) as influenced by planting layouts, spacings and nutrient management under drip irrigation. J Med Aromat Plant Sci 37: 22-29.

Views
274
Downloads
1
Citations